This is about Rickmers Maritime. source:
mosi.sg/blog/2013/4/24/soaring-like-an-eagle
I just want to share some salient points raised at the AGM/EGM:
This is the longest down cycle in the shipping sector but things appear to be getting better.
It's business as usual. Management is hopeful that MSC will charter Kaethe C. Rickmers in Sept 2013 on a long charter. Other than that, the next major 'risk' would come in early 2014 with the two 3,450 TEUs leased to Ital Marittima (part of Evergreen) expiring.
Pleasantly surprised by board's friendliness to unitholders. They understand the importance of sustaining and growing DPU.
New build is at a low of 20%, down from 60% of capacity in 2008. Future capacity growth is constrained but there are still many unknowns - trade volume, Chinese shipyards/building capacity, ship financing, demolition etc
Banks are getting out of the financing space - meaning, only the well capitalised shipowners will survive and grow.
So what does it mean?
This is not a short term gamble
You cannot expect to flip the stock and make 15% overnight
There may be price inefficiencies during the trading of the rights and different strategies for you if you are into that. But in the greater scheme of things, it doesn't matter
Calling a spade a spade: RMT is a leveraged play on container shipping. If you buy in, you expect container shipping rates to recover.
How bad can it get? Industry wise, not much. If somebody goes bust, it's not a bad thing as capacity will likely be withdrawn. Hopefully, it's not a RMT counter party.
How bad can it get? For RMT, again, not much. IMHO, the default/counterparty risk now is much lower than 1-2 years ago. Leverage is now so low that banks will be shooting themselves if they pull the loan from RMT.
In any case, the rights issue should settle the nerves of the bankers.
If you examine the facts and figures and take the position that recovery is not happening anytime soon, then don't buy into the RMT story.