UMS: Revenue for Q1 2015 was $27.5 million, down 20% compared to Q1 2014, but up 25% compared to Q4 2014.

Net profit of $7.5 million for Q1 2015 was down 12% compared to Q1 2014, but up 105% compared to Q4 2014.

Uneven quarterly revenue and profits are due to variation in demand pattern of this semiconductor business. Earnings per share was 1.76 cts for Q1, while NAV per share was $0.46. Current PE ratio is 7.3 times and price-to-book ratio is 1.11.

UMS CIMBUMS chief executive Andy Luong at CIMB. NextInsight file photo

Cash flow is positive, as the company generated $6.4 million free cash flow for Q1. Balance sheet remains healthy. Working capital ratio is 5.3, with $40 million in cash and cash equivalent, translating into 9.3 cents a share.

Dividend payout has been consistent. 1 cent interim dividend has been declared. A total of 6 cents dividend was paid last year, and that represents more than 11% dividend yield.

As the outlook of the semiconductor equipment business remain positive in 2015, the company has expected business activities to remain stable in the coming quarters. Technically, 47 cents may be a good entry point based on 50% Fibo retracement.



LINC ENERGY: Results are poor and moved from bad to worse. Q3 revenue dropped 51% to AUD 17.2 million compared to prior year's same quarter.

Loss from continued operation jumped to a hefty AUD 74 million, 86% more than prior year's similar quarter. YTD nine months loss from continued operations has clocked almost AUD 134 million, although lower than prior year's YTD of AUD 150 million.

That loss translated into 22.5 cts AUD a share. Its NAV per shar
e has dropped from 45 cts AUD a share in March 2014 to 26 cts AUD (28 cts SGD) a share at end March 2015.

Its balance sheet recorded borrowings of AUD 675 million with equity of only AUD 154 million. Working capital is very tight.

All the hype about restructuring, rationalisation, asset divestment trying to calm investors and hold its share price may be fruitless if there is no concrete plan to reverse the loss.

Management must inform shareholders what has been done, what action is being taken, when will shareholders see results, and its impact in monetary terms on the bottom line and balance sheet.

No point promulgating abstract management ideas like set foundations, implementation of scorecards and quarterly targets, strategic planning sessions, financial compliance and cost control, process maps, gap analysis, etc. etc.

Shareholders just want to see a quick turnaround to consistent, profitable growth as well as strengthen the balance sheet. Don't ask for more cash. No rights issue. No share placement. No bond issue. Otherwise, this share will collapse to less than 20 cents... and then... comes share consolidation.


ChanKitWhyePrior to his retirement, Chan Kit Whye (left) worked more than 30 years as Regional Finance Director, Financial Controller and Manager in a multinational specialty chemical business. He has played an active role in CPA (Australia) Singapore Branch, taking up positions in its Continuing Professional Development and Social Committees.   Kit Whye is a Fellow of CPA Australia, CA of Institute of Singapore Chartered Accountants and CA of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants. He holds a BBus(Transport) Degree from RMIT, MAcc Degree from Charles Sturt University and MBA from Durham Business School.

You may also be interested in:


Comments  

#1 WL 2015-06-11 16:59
Good analysis, simple and straight to the point. See the company's picture clearly from the financial numbers, and not influenced by "smoke" of the management. (smoke means those management jargon).
 

We have 1937 guests and no members online

rss_2 NextInsight - Latest News