For new loans taken out from now on.... the average loan size has been cut by about half! Well done, LTA.
Now, do the following:
a. extend the no. of years before a car (offpeak cars, & normal cars) goes for inspection. Cars are more robust these days, don't hv to send for so frequent inspection and fill the pockets of Vicom.
b. help bring about lower insurance premiums for offpeak cars.
This letter writer in ST Forum has expressed it well today:
NOW that car insurers are reaping profits ("Motor premiums steady as insurers' profit soars"; March 14), should they not charge off-peak cars a different premium from that of ordinary cars?
Insurance companies should use probability and statistics in actuarial science to arrive at premiums.
Off-peak cars are on the road for a shorter duration and at times when traffic is less congested. Hence, conditions are safer and the chances of getting into accidents are lower.
At the moment, not only is there no distinction between off-peak cars and ordinary cars, but I have heard that insurers also impose a minimum premium for all car insurance policies.
The incentive of a 5 per cent discount on premiums, if a driver does not have any demerit points for three years, does not apply if, after the discount, the premium falls below the minimum level imposed by insurers.
Also, the Land Transport Authority should not impose the same car inspection rules for off-peak cars, since they are used less often and are subject to less wear and tear. Perhaps the compulsory inspection for them could be pushed back to the sixth year, saving drivers money.
To this end, I believe that compulsory inspection even for ordinary cars can be done after five years. After all, Singapore's roads are well maintained and new cars are of a much higher quality.
Matthew Yeo Cheng Heng