coal

  • Singapore-listed Geo Energy and Golden Energy & Resources are set to report sterling 2022 profits, given the strong coal selling prices of 2022. But coal price has softened in recent weeks, so what impact might this have on stock valuations and dividends? Check out DBS report below which basically says:

    • Dividends from coal companies will be a catalyst in 1H23
    • At US$200 per ton Newcastle coal price, coal still offers decent earnings and dividends 


    Excerpts from DBS Research report
    Analyst: William Simadiputra


    Coal price

    Coal price set to drop from record high level in 2022.

    Coal price has stayed at a record high for almost twelve months. The Ukraine-Russia conflict had lifted the EU LNG price, as well as the energy spectrum in 2022.

    Now, with the receding conflict and fears of a global recession in 2023, coal price could be vulnerable to a correction especially as China can start tightening its grip on commodities import policies as seen by China relaxing its import ban on Australian coal.


    Australia coal imports to China is a sign that coal remains very much in demand.

    Limited downside risk
    coal hand pic
    "We see the downside risk of coal price as limited since share prices did not fully price in the record-breaking earnings and coal price last year."

    We view China’s reopening and April 2023 coal import resumption from Australia as positive signs that coal demand remains intact despite fears of recession and dissipating impact of war on the energy market.

    European coal demand has been diminishing since December 2022 due to a mild winter and normalizing gas price trend.

    Supplies will come online slower than previous bull cycle.

    Muted supply expansion will keep coal price at a decent level albeit it may lose some premium because of dissipating panic buying spree that boosted Newcastle coal price to above US$300 per ton last year.

    Normalizing weather in 2023 post severe than expected La Nina in 2022 also played a role to cool down prices this year.

    Geo Energy Resources

    Quarterly dividends

    1Q21

    2Q21

    3Q21

    4Q21

    1Q22

    2Q22

    3Q22

    4Q22

    SGD cent

    0.5

    0.5

    3

    5

    2

    2

    1

    ?


    Share price performance and valuation

    • Coal stocks had a rough start in 2023; share prices have tumbled c.20% YTD on average after gaining 52% in 2022.

    Coal stocks have corrected amid major foreign outflows from the JCI (Jakarta Composite Index) as well as on fears that coal price may tumble after hitting record high levels in the past 12 months.

    Coal stocks were JCI’s best performing stocks last year.

    Earnings outlook
    • Decent earnings in 2023 while compelling valuation poses limited downside risk.

    We see the downside risk of coal price as limited since share price did not fully price in the record-breaking earnings and coal price last year.

    Meanwhile, investors are bracing for the lower earnings trend in 2023, which is reflected on the PE multiple –now well below the industry’s five-year average.


    Coal stocks performed well in 2022; could it sustain its winning streak this year?

    We think coal stocks have room to withstand any sell-off due to tapering coal price expectation.

    Concerns over how long commodity prices can hold the current record-high level have led investors to flock to green metal companies’ potential IPOs in Indonesia.

    The IPOs will likely generate interest among domestic investors, and we think also played role on early 2023 sell-off to several coal mining companies.

    However, considering the earnings performance will be fuelled by non-coal business contribution, we believe we couldn’t fully compare coal price level this year to where the share price traded historically.

    Full report here.

  • After a highly profitable 2022, and laden with cash even after paying out large dividends to shareholders, Geo Energy is looking to make asset acquisitions.

    Cash & bank balance

    US$234.1 million

    *as at end-2022

    That may be just around the corner, as Geo Energy has identified coal mines it is keen on but has not given a timeline.

    Yes, coal mines.

    CFO Adam Tan said in an investor briefing on its 2022 results this week that Geo Energy's expertise is in the coal sector and it made sense for it to expand its business there and ensure business certainty given that its key producing mines have 5-6 years worth of coal left. 

    "We have been involved in coal mining for more than 20 years. We are looking for diversification in terms of geography -- mines which are located in other parts of Indonesia -- and calorific value of the coal."


    coal picIn 2022, the average production cash cost increased to US$43.10/t (2021: US$31.37/t) due to a higher mining strip ratio at the TBR mine, higher fuel prices as well as higher sales royalty with effect from Sept 2022.

    Excerpts from investor Q&A session with CFO Adam Tan:

    Q: Regarding the cash balance, do you foresee increasing share buybacks or any other form of capital return to investors?


    Adam Tan CFOAdam Tan, CFOA: 
    Our company believes part of capital allocation in returning value to shareholders is through dividends. That's why we have declared over 51% of our earnings as dividends. 

    The cash balance that we have currently in our bank account is predominantly set aside for M&A acquisition.

    We believe the way to unlock the value of the shares is through making a good acquisition that will secure the long term business of the company, not just predominantly relying on share buybacks and dividends.

    div bonanza3.23
     

    Q: For M&A, would you rely entirely on your balance sheet or will you also try to get some external financing or execute share placement, rights issue, etc.


    A: If it's one M&A, we don't really need financing. 
    If we are going to do 2 acquisitions, then there will be a requirement to draw upon financing.

    In terms of share placement etc, right now we recognize our stock is undervalued. 
    Of course, if the incoming party as part of a structured deal is interested in coming in at a premium to the market price, we can discuss. But we want to restrict the amount of equity raised through share placement if the share price is based on the existing share price.

     

    Q: Should we expect acquisitions to be at EV/EBIDTA multiples similar to Geo Energy's or higher?  (Geo Energy's EV/EBIDTA is a very low 0.4X).

     

    Stock price 

    31.5 c

    52-wk range

    30 – 60 c

    PE 

    1.4

    Market cap

    $444 m

    Shares outstanding

    1.41 b

    Dividend 
    yield 

    29 %

    1-yr change

    -41%

    P/B

    0.86

    Source: Yahoo!

    A: The targets we're looking at are producing assets. They had very strong EBITDA last year because coal prices were very strong.

    But w
    e cannot base the acquisition price on a fantastic year, we have to moderate it in the event that coal prices come down a bit, making sure that we still have strong EBITDA from these acquisitions.

    Whatever we acquire should have stronger multiples than what we are trading at in terms of EBITDA. We should not be paying over 2 + or 3 times. Definitely, it has to be value-accretive to the company.

    Q: With regards to renewables, do you think that the slow scalability of renewables give you an extended run for good profitability on coal?

     
    A: We recognize the importance of renewables in the long term but it's something that will take time.

    We can't stop all the coal production given the shortage of energy worldwide. Definitely there is a decreased amount of funding into the coal industry. That creates a higher barrier to entry. So coal prices are expected to remain relatively strong due to the demand-supply gap.

    Supply can't be increased readily except by operating mines that have the ability to ramp up, which is quite limited. 

    D
    ue to the lack of external financing, only parties like us with a lot of cash on the balance sheet can partner or work together to increase coal production as demand continues to go up.  

    Q: With the current visibility that you have, do you expect to distribute quarterly dividends in 2023 as well?

     

    A: We are one of the few companies on the SGX that give quarterly dividends. We want to return the cash flow earlier to our shareholders instead of half-yearly or at year-end. 

    For the moment, there is no intention to change this, but it depends on our M&A strategy.  If we are going to utilize a significant amount of cash for M&A, we could consider dividends given half yearly, or some form of change. 

    The Q&A has been edited for brevity and clarity.

    Geo Energy's 2022 results presentation deck is here.

  • With its professional judgement called into question by SIAS over a listed company's delisting proposal, an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA) unleashed a lengthy rebuttal yesterday.

    W Capital Markets is the IFA appointed by Golden Energy & Resources (Gear)to provide an opinion for the proposed distribution in-specie of its GEMS shares to Gear shareholders and an exit offer.

    Gear owns stakes in Indonesian thermal coal player GEMS, metallurgical coal player Stanmore Resources, and unlisted Aussie gold miner Ravenswood Gold. 

    SIAS, on its website on 30 May 2023, had said: 
    • “Disappointingly, the IFA has conflated the two corporate actions despite SIAS’ highlighting this specific concern at the meeting with GEAR”

    • “Clearly, SGX RegCo’s reminder to the IFA regarding the utilization of appropriate valuation methodologies and the necessity for analysis supported by reasonable grounds and assumptions capable of withstanding scrutiny has seemingly fallen on deaf ears”

    • “SIAS feels that the IFA has not met the expectations set specifically by SGX RegCo”.


    crane4.17
    W Capital said it wished to "categorically refute the above allegations which we view to be misconceived and injurious."

    Its response covers: 

    1. Scope of the IFA's opinion and allegation of conflating of two corporate actions
    2. Approach taken by IFA for the valuation of GEMS Shares
    3. Valuation methodologies adopted in respect of the assessment of the Proposed Distribution and Exit Offer

    Firm belief

    WayneLee W Capital

    “W
    e firmly believe that our IFA opinion in respect of the Proposed Distribution and Exit Offer is based on appropriate valuation methodologies and supported by reasonable grounds and assumptions."

    -- Wayne Lee,
    Chairman & CEO,
    W Capital Markets

    W Capital concluded: "Whilst we acknowledge that no single method of valuation will be met with universal acceptance and we humbly respect differences in views and opinions, the Board of W Capital Markets would like to put on record that we have always been mindful and use our best endeavours to ensure that we exercise due care, skill and professional judgement in all advisory engagements and firmly believe that our IFA opinion in respect of the Proposed Distribution and Exit Offer is based on appropriate valuation methodologies and supported by reasonable grounds and assumptions."

    W Capital's full response can be found here.

    The Business Times on 29 May 2023 had also taken issue with W Capital's opinion on Gear's offer.

    Business Times senior correspondent Ben Paul opined that the IFA opinion is faulty as:

    (i) the IFA has valued the stake of Gear in its Indonesia-listed thermal coal arm (GEMS) inappropriately in its sum-of-the-parts model; and

    (ii) the IFA has not provided any analysis on whether the exit offer for Gear (which takes place after its Indonesian arm has been separated) is fair and reasonable.


    W Capital's response covers:

    1. Approach taken for the valuation of GEMS Shares
    2. IFA opinion in respect of the Proposed Distribution and Exit Offer


    W Capital's full response can be found here.

    Gear, for its part, also issued a response to SIAS's "inaccuracies and omissions" reportd by Business Times and The Straits Times, in particular, SIAS’ commentaries on:

    (i) the scope of the IFA's opinion, the IFA “conflating the two corporate actions”, and the IFA’s utilisation of methodologies in its opinion; and

    (ii) the framing of the Company’s corporate actions to Shareholders as being two simple decisions. 
    "The Non-Conflicted Directors maintain their recommendation to Shareholders to vote in favour of the Distribution Resolution and the Delisting Resolution, and to accept the Exit Offer."

    - Golden Energy & Resources
    Notably, Gear said the "Non-Conflicted Directors" of Gear concur with the IFA’s approach for the valuation of the GEMS shares and the valuation methodologies adopted in the assessment of the Proposed Distribution and Exit Offer.

    The Non-Conflicted Directors who are considered independent for the purpose of making the recommendation to Shareholders in respect of the Proposed Transactions are: (a) Mr. Dwi Prasetyo Suseno; (b) Mr. Mark Zhou You Chuan; (c) Mr. Mochtar Suhadi; (d) Mr. Lim Yu Neng Paul; (e) Mr. Lew Syn Pau; (f) Mr. Irwandy Arif; and (g) Ms. Noormaya Muchlis

    The Non-Conflicted Directors maintain their recommendation to Shareholders to vote in favour of the Distribution Resolution and the Delisting Resolution, and to accept the Exit Offer.

    The all-cash offer -- ie a Gear shareholder accepts cash for his GEMS entitlement in addition to cash for the delisting of Gear -- is a total of 97.3 cents for every Gear share he holds. Gear last traded at 94.5 cents yesterday.


    >> Gear's full response -- as a filing on the SGX website -- can be found here

    >> Gear's circular to shareholders can be found here. 

  • A higher all-cash offer has been made for Golden Energy & Resources (GEAR) shares which encourages shareholders to opt for the all-cash option -- instead of part share and part cash.

    From 84.6 Singapore cents a share in the original all-cash offer announced in Nov 2022, it's now 97.3 cents, a 15% increase, said GEAR and offeror Duchess Avenue in a joint statement over the weekend.

    The 97.3 cents all-cash option is slightly superior to the revised 96.4 cents value that a shareholder will get if he opts for part share and part cash, according to GEAR's illustration.


    aerialport5.18Thermal coal operations at GEMS. File photo.

    Highest ever

    “Since the resumption of trading of GEAR shares in December 2016 following completion of the reverse takeover exercise of the Company, the closing prices of the shares have not exceeded the Revised All Cash Consideration of S$0.973.

    -- Golden Energy & Resources

    Being more attractive, the new all-cash option addresses the complaint that shareholders had regarding the trading illiquidity and forex risk from accepting shares under the original offer of PT Golden Energy Mines (GEMS), a Jakarta-listed entity, in a partial exchange for GEAR shares. 

    GEAR owns 62.5% of GEMS.

    Golden Energy & Resources

    Subsidiary

    Commodity

    Ownership by GEAR

    Jurisdiction

    GEMS

    Thermal coal

    62.5%

    Indonesia

    Stanmore

    Metallurgical coal

    64.1%

    Australia

    Ravenswood

    Gold

    50.0%

    Australia



    The all-cash offer, which increased to 97.3 cents from 84.6 cents, comprises:

    • Increase in cash price by 18%, to IDR6,500 from IDR5,500 for GEMS shares.

    This will be paid in Singapore dollars based on fixed SGD:IDR exchange rate, thereby removing forex risk up to date of payment.

    • Increase in exit offer price by 13%, to 18.1 cents from 16.0 cents.

    The exit offer covers GEAR's stakes in various assets, especially 64%-owned ASX-listed Stanmore Resources and 50%-owned Ravenswood Gold Group, an unlisted gold miner in Australia.

     

    Factors considered in determining the increase:
    (a) the financial performance of GEAR and its subsidiaries for the year ended 31 December 2022, and the business outlook as described in GEAR’s results announcement published on 27 February 2023;

    (b) the financial resources available to GEAR, the Offeror and DSS to implement the proposed transactions (including the payment of the revised cash alternative price by GEAR and PT Dian Swastatika Sentosa Tbk (DSS)*, and the revised exit offer price by the Offeror); and

    c) the historical traded price of the Shares.

    GEAR notes that since the resumption of trading of the Shares in December 2016 following completion of the reverse takeover exercise of GEAR, the closing prices of the shares have not exceeded the revised all-cash consideration of S$0.973.

    * With a 77.5% stake, DSS is the majority shareholder of GEAR.

     

 

We have 2572 guests and no members online

rss_2 NextInsight - Latest News