tbss9.14Rubber accelerators ready to be shipped out from Sunsine's plant. NextInsight file photoThe 2Q2016 profit of China Sunsine Chemical is likely to be higher than 1Q2016, according to 'Portuser' in this article contribution to NextInsight.

At "higher than RMB46 m" (compared to the RMB33.6 m achieved in 1Q2016), the expected net profit is premised on two factors:

China Sunsine
Share price: 
40.5 c
Source: KGI Fraser
Target: 
54 c
♦ Higher average selling prices as they are pegged to prices of input materials which have recovered from steep falls, and,

♦ Ramping up of production, leading to better economies of scale.


China Sunsine is the world's largest producer of rubber accelerators, China's largest producer of insoluble sulphur, and a significant producer of anti-oxidants. Of the three rubber chemicals, rubber accelerators, along with anti-oxidants, accounted for 90% of Sunsine's 2015 total revenue. Their main input material is aniline which is derived from crude oil.

Record profit in 2014

Sunsine's gross profit surged 84% in 2014 as average selling price (ASP) and sales volume both rose 11%. Tyre factories, seeing stricter enforcement against pollution, bought more from Sunsine, which is known for its green production processes.

That year’s RMB 220m net profit, which would have been higher without one-off expenses, was twice the previous record of RMB 115m in 2010, and thrice the preceding year's RMB 77m.   

Setback in 2015

Aniline price dropped 30% in 2015, pulling the ASP down by 15%. Despite the 5% rise in sales volume, gross profit declined 13%: 


 Table A 2013 2014 2015

Revenue (RMB m) 

1,696

2,077

1,859

ASP  (RMB/tonne) 17,200 19,100 16,200
Sales volume (tonnes) 98,300 109,000

114,600

Gross profit (RMB m) 

308 567 492
Gross profit margin 18.2% 27.3% 26.5%

Net profit (RMB m) 

77 220 208


Aniline price movement

Aniline price halved, from RMB 11,200 in Aug 14 to RMB 5,300 in Feb 16, as oil price tanked. It has since recovered slightly.


aniline asp6.16

Correlation between ASP and aniline price

A strong correlation exists between ASP and aniline price (as the chart shows)

It should be noted that the selling price that Sunsine sets for an order is recognized later, for example a month later, when the manufactured goods are delivered. 

Hence, the RMB 14,800 ASP for 1Q16 (as shown in the chart) was the average set between 1 Dec 15 and 29 Feb 16, rather than between 1 Jan and 31 Mar 16.  Also, the RMB 5,446 shown as the 1Q16 average aniline price was in fact for the period between 1 Dec 15 and 29 Feb 16.

1Q16 performance

As shown in the chart, the ASP continued its fall, to reach RMB 14,800 in 1Q16 as aniline price dropped to RMB 5,446. However, higher sales volume enabled Sunsine to report a decent profit (RMB33.6 m) in that quarter:


 Table B 4Q15 1Q16
ASP (RMB m) 15,600 14,800
Sales volume (tonnes) 29,045 30,500
Gross profit (RMB m) 106.6 108.9
Gross profit margin 23.5% 24.2%
Net profit (RMB m) 59.6* 33.6
*There were write-backs of expenses in 4Q15.    

                                                                                                                           

It should be noted that even though first quarter (where the Lunar New Year falls) is the weakest of the four quarters in a year, 1Q16 sales volume was very high, exceeding 4Q15’s and 18% higher than 1Q15’s.  

♦ Projecting 2Q16 profit

As average aniline prices between Mar and May 16 (RMB 6,239) and between Sep and Nov 15 (RMB 6,263) were similar, 4Q15 data may be used to project 2Q16 performance:

 Table C 4Q15 (actual) 2Q16 (projected) 1Q16(actual)
ASP (RMB) 15,600 15,600 14,800
Sales volume (tonnes) 29,045 33,056* 30,050
Gross profit
(RMB m)
106.6 ? 108.9
Gross profit margin 23.5% ? 24.2%
Net profit (RMB m) 59.6 ? 33.6


*The projected 2Q16 sales volume of 33,056 tonnes is assumed to be 10% higher than 1Q16’s, a reasonable figure compared with the higher increases in previous years:
 

Table D                           Sales volume (tonnes)
  1Q 2Q Change (%)
2011 12,971 15,796 21.8
2012 18,333 20,411 11.3
2013 22,049 24,794 12.4
2014 23,899 29,470 23.3
2015 25,377 30,948 22.0
2016 30,051 33,056(?) 10.0 (?)


ceo meet9.14China Sunsine CEO Liu Jing Fu (centre) flanked by financial controller Tong Yiping (left) and independent director Koh Choon Kong during a meeting in Shanxian with Singapore investors and analysts in 2014.
NextInsight file photo.
(Unused capacity will still be considerable as Sunsine's current annual capacity is 152,000 tonnes or 38,000 tonnes every quarter. Sunsine plans to add another 30,000 tonnes of TBBS capacity. TBBS is a high-grade rubber accelerator which fetches good selling prices and margins.)

The calculations at the end of this article show RMB 46m as a likely profit for 2Q16, on the assumption that the fixed cost is only 11.6% of production cost, as in 2006. The actual percentage should be much higher because of the current low raw material prices and low capacity utilisation (79% in 1Q1, and 75% in 2015).

Profit will rise further as production is ramped up.

In its 1Q results announcement, Sunsine sounded more upbeat than before when it stated: 

"International crude oil prices have remained depressed, which has resulted in our main raw material prices remaining at low levels. However, as the China tire industry generally experienced under-utilisation issues during the second half of 2015, which may have depleted their inventory levels, the Group believes that utilisation rate of tire industry will increase starting from 2Q2016, which will indirectly increase the demand for our products, and may have a positive effect on our ASP in subsequent quarters." 

Notes:   

4Q15 gross profit of RMB 106.6m was from selling 29,045 tonnes at ASP of RMB 15,600 and gross profit margin of 23.5%.

As fixed cost had already been fully factored in the gross profit margin of 23.5% in 4Q15, contribution to gross profit from the incremental sales volume of 4,011 tonnes (33,056 tonnes – 29,045 tonnes [in Table C]) is in excess of 23.5%.   

According to Sunsine's IPO prospectus, fixed cost amounted to 11.6% of production cost in 2006. By now, with sharply lower raw material cost, fixed cost’s share of production cost should be much higher.

4Q15 production cost was 76.5% of ASP, as gross profit margin was 23.5%. Fixed cost, even if it were only 11.6% of production cost, is 8.8% (=11.6% * 76.5%) of ASP.

Therefore, 32.3% (=8.8% + 23.5%) of incremental sales revenue flow to 2Q16 gross profit, and the amount is RMB 20.2m  (= 32.2% * RMB 15,600/tonne * 4,011 tonnes). Adding this to 4Q15 gross profit of RMB 106.6m gives rise to gross profit of RMB 126.8m, RMB 18.9m higher than 1Q16’s.

After netting off RMB 2.4m (= 4,011 tonnes * RMB 600/tonne) in selling & distribution cost, contribution to pre-tax profit and net profit are RMB 16.5m and RMB 12.4m respectively.

RMB 46m (=RMB 12.4m + RMB 33.6m) is therefore a likely profit for 2Q16.

You may also be interested in:


You have no rights to post comments

Counter NameLastChange
AEM Holdings2.290-0.070
Best World2.4600.020
Boustead Singapore0.945-0.015
Broadway Ind0.125-0.003
China Aviation Oil (S)0.905-0.005
China Sunsine0.405-0.005
ComfortDelGro1.450-0.010
Delfi Limited0.895-0.005
Food Empire1.280-0.040
Fortress Minerals0.305-0.015
Geo Energy Res0.305-
Hong Leong Finance2.480-0.010
Hongkong Land (USD)2.840-0.010
InnoTek0.520-0.015
ISDN Holdings0.3000.005
ISOTeam0.042-0.001
IX Biopharma0.040-0.005
KSH Holdings0.2550.005
Leader Env0.050-
Ley Choon0.0440.001
Marco Polo Marine0.067-0.002
Mermaid Maritime0.136-0.003
Nordic Group0.310-0.005
Oxley Holdings0.089-
REX International0.1380.003
Riverstone0.790-0.005
Southern Alliance Mining0.445-
Straco Corp.0.4950.010
Sunpower Group0.205-0.005
The Trendlines0.069-
Totm Technologies0.022-
Uni-Asia Group0.825-
Wilmar Intl3.4000.020
Yangzijiang Shipbldg1.740-0.030
 

We have 687 guests and no members online

rss_2 NextInsight - Latest News