Sapphire’s share price slumped 8% from $0.335 on 27 Feb 2017 (before their results on 27 Feb, after market) to close at $0.310 on 10 Mar 2017. Are the FY16 results bad? If yes, why did Mr Teh, CEO of Sapphire, record his first purchase since Sep 2015 now? 

Below are my five observations on Sapphire’s results. Click HERE for the press release. 

Table 1: Snapshot of Sapphire’s results

 

Source: Company

5 observations on Sapphire’s results

1. Disposed loss-making Mancala to be a focused infrastructure play

Sapphire has divested the bulk of Mancala. Based on most industry experts, it is likely that the mining industry may have bottomed in 2016. Thus with the 81% disposal of Mancala, it is likely that Sapphire may not report any significant losses in FY17F. With this disposal, Sapphire has become a serious and focused infrastructure play which may aid in their resource management and possible future re-rating prospects.


2. FY17F likely to be better

Based on the above assumption that Mancala may not report significant losses in FY17F, Sapphire is likely to generate net profit of around S$11.4m in FY17F, based on 0% growth in earnings for FY17F (See Table 1 above where Sapphire’s infrastructure business generated $11.4m profit in FY16). Given such conservative estimates, Sapphire trades at 9x FY17F earnings. However, management continues to target a 20-30% growth in capacity in FY17F which may translate to approx. 20-30% growth in revenue next year in a simplistic way. Such growth is likely to translate to around 6 – 8 x FY17F PE ceteris paribus. Midas trades at 17x FY17F PE. (I wish to emphasise that I am NOT an analyst and any estimates, especially on valuations and earnings estimates, are purely my guesstimates only.)

3. Balance sheet strengthens

Besides improvement in net profit and net operating cash flow, Sapphire’s gearing has improved from 0.79x to 0.40x in FY16. Net asset value also increased from $0.27 on 31 Dec 2015 to $0.30 on 31 Dec 2016.

4. May have contracts soon

I noted a peculiar sentence in both Sapphire’s press release and its detailed financial results. I assume management is aware that up to now, they have not announced any contracts since 28 Sep 2016 thus, they seek to assure investors. For example, in para 10 in the financial results statement, management wrote: “The Group’s order book stood at RMB2.3 billion ($478.9 million) as at 31 December 2016 after delivering part of the works in progress while following up closely on new contracts won over the next few weeks.” What I interpret from this sentence (purely my guess à may, or may not be the true picture), is that management is following up closely on the status of its new contract bids.

5. Industry prospects continue to be bright

Based on its FY16 results, management is confident that Ranken is well positioned to ride the wave of public infrastructure spending / construction management works in China, Bangladesh and other parts of South Asia. According to some statistics, China is expected to invest a further RMB 4.7 trillion in transport infrastructure over the next three years as it extends its ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiative.

♦ CEO’s purchase, first since Sep 2015

TehWingKwan 6.2016Teh Wing Kwan, CEO of Sapphire. NextInsight fie photo.There is another noteworthy development on Sapphire after its FY16 results. Mr Teh, CEO of Sapphire, bought 300K Sapphire shares @$0.323 on 28 Feb 2017 & 415K shares @$0.318 on 1 Mar 2017.

This was the first purchase since his purchase of 550K Sapphire shares @$0.240 on 10 Sep 2015 (adjusted for post share consolidation). On 8 Mar 2017, Mr Teh acquired another 2m Sapphire shares @$0.315 via off market purchase. Furthermore, on 9 Mar 2017, Mr Teh bought 173K Sapphire shares @$0.315. This raised his stake to 7.02m Sapphire shares.

Based on my personal observations (which arguably are not corroborated by hard facts), recall that Mr Sydney Yeung, GSS Energy CEO started his first (after a few years) purchases of GSS Energy shares at $0.085 in Jan 2017 [click HERE for my late Nov 2016 write-up when GSS Energy last traded at $0.078].

GSS Energy subsequently rocketed to an intraday high of $0.190 on 7 Mar 2017 without any significant announcement, except for their FY16 results announcement and subsequent share purchases by Sydney. Sydney is positive on his company’s prospects when he started buying his company’s shares in Jan 2017 while the market did not believe the company’s prospects. GSS Energy closed at $0.173 on 10 Mar 2017.

Why do I cite GSS Energy here? Based on my personal observations, there seems to be parallels between this share purchase in GSS Energy and Sapphire’s share purchase. Although I am aware that there is no 100% link between the first (after a few years) insider share purchases vs whether the share price will move higher in the months ahead, those who know Mr Teh personally are aware that he has a good track record, be it in managing companies or investments.

Let’s wait, see and assess.


Possible M&A?

A 16 Jan 2017 The Edge article reported that Sapphire is on a look-out for possible synergistic M&A to boost their product offerings. For example, it may acquire companies with product offerings in crowd monitoring and management systems that would be needed in places such as railway stations. These acquisitions are unlikely to be big acquisitions but it would be complementary to Sapphire.

Chart observations

Based on Chart 1 below, although 21D exponential moving average (‘EMA”) has turned lower, Sapphire is still on a medium-term uptrend. Indicators such as OBV, RSI, MACD have weakened. However, 100D and 200D EMA are still rising. A break below $0.295 with volume expansion and on a sustained basis is bearish for the chart. However, this seems unlikely with the cluster of supports around $0.295 – 0.315. Conversely, a break above $0.370 with volume expansion and on a sustained basis is bullish for the chart.

Near term supports: $0.310 – 0.315 / 0.305 / 0.300

Near term resistances: $0.320 / 0.335 / 0.345


Chart 1: Sapphire still on an uptrend since Jun 2016

Source: Chartnexus 10 Mar 2017

Conclusion / Personal opinion

ernest newphotoErnest Lim, CFA, CA.Although the market may view Sapphire’s results a tad below expectations on Mancala’s losses and lack of new contracts announced, my personal view is that Sapphire’s FY16 results look good based on the above observations.

Furthermore, based on chart, Sapphire is trading near a cluster of strong supports around $0.295 – 0.315.  This, coupled with insider’s purchase, bodes well for Sapphire. As with all investments (most investments carry a certain degree of risk), readers should carefully evaluate each investment decision with care.

Disclaimer

Please refer to the disclaimer HERE

Article is republished with permission from Ernest Lim's blog

Counter NameLastChange
AEM Holdings2.3600.010
Best World2.440-0.040
Boustead Singapore0.9600.010
Broadway Ind0.128-0.001
China Aviation Oil (S)0.9100.005
China Sunsine0.410-
ComfortDelGro1.4600.010
Delfi Limited0.900-
Food Empire1.320-
Fortress Minerals0.3200.005
Geo Energy Res0.305-0.010
Hong Leong Finance2.4900.010
Hongkong Land (USD)2.8500.030
InnoTek0.535-
ISDN Holdings0.295-0.010
ISOTeam0.0430.004
IX Biopharma0.045-0.003
KSH Holdings0.250-
Leader Env0.0500.002
Ley Choon0.043-
Marco Polo Marine0.069-0.002
Mermaid Maritime0.139-0.003
Nordic Group0.315-0.010
Oxley Holdings0.0890.001
REX International0.135-0.002
Riverstone0.795-0.010
Southern Alliance Mining0.445-0.005
Straco Corp.0.485-
Sunpower Group0.210-
The Trendlines0.069-
Totm Technologies0.022-0.001
Uni-Asia Group0.8250.005
Wilmar Intl3.3800.010
Yangzijiang Shipbldg1.770-0.010