Excerpts from analyst's report


NOL shipPhoto: http://www.seanews.com.tr/news/102126/
raymondyapCIMB analyst: Raymond Yap, CFA (left)


NOL delivered a core net loss of S$7.6m in 2Q15, taking the cumulative 1H loss to S$9m, which was much better than our full-year loss estimate of S$120m. While freight rates were weaker than forecast, lower unit costs more than made up for the differential, as NOL quietly abandoned its loss-making inland transportation business. This is the first time we have heard NOL speak on this part of the business, and had not factored in such significant cost savings.

Hence we are halving our loss forecast for FY15 and doubling our FY16 profit forecast. Still, NOL is unlikely to be profitable in FY15 given tough industry conditions, which is why we keep our Hold call, with a higher target price based on 1 s.d. below the P/BV mean since 2001, i.e. 0.76x (from 0.8x).


Highlights of 2Q15
NOL reported a net profit of US$890m in 2Q15, but stripping out gains on disposal of APL Logistics of close to US$900m, the core net loss came to S$7.6m, much better than the US$59m loss last year. Just looking at the average freight rate decline of a staggering 16.7% yoy, we would have thought the losses would have widened, but the reverse happened instead.

NOL walked away from loss-making business
The key lies in understanding how less-than-optimally NOL had been running its business before this, and the decision that NOL took to aggressively put loss-making cargoes on the chopping board. NOL’s volumes fell 12% yoy in 2Q, on top of the 15% fall in 1Q, as it reduced its exposure to door-to-door boxes which required inland transportation, for which freight rates never fully compensated for the land-based costs. As a result, NOL’s unit costs fell 13.7% yoy during the 2Q, against single digit declines seen in prior years, and was also assisted by lower bunker prices, which fell 41% yoy. This move to a higher proportion of port-to-port cargoes, and a lower exposure to higher-rate door-to-door cargoes, partly explains why NOL’s freight rate drop fell so much.

Outlook could worsen before it gets better
Skipped sailings for the Jul-Sep period on the AE trade may stabilise the freight rates, but TP rate outlook for the next six months could remain at risk from a weak peak season and as no carrier has announced capacity reductions. Worse, BCO customers may start asking for contract rate revisions if spot rates do not pick up. The outlook may improve in 2016, but it is too soon to make this call.

Full report here.

You may also be interested in:


Comments  

#1 David.Lim 2015-07-31 11:41
They made profits by selling businesses and assets and not from their actual shiiping operations which is struggling all the while. The only positive way forward i see will be some bigger shipping co acquire them complete and integrate into their global operations!

You have no rights to post comments

Counter NameLastChange
AEM Holdings2.340-0.090
Best World2.480-0.010
Boustead Singapore0.9500.005
Broadway Ind0.132-0.002
China Aviation Oil (S)0.915-0.010
China Sunsine0.400-0.005
ComfortDelGro1.470-
Delfi Limited0.905-0.010
Food Empire1.320-0.010
Fortress Minerals0.310-0.010
Geo Energy Res0.315-
Hong Leong Finance2.5000.010
Hongkong Land (USD)2.910-0.040
InnoTek0.505-0.015
ISDN Holdings0.300-
ISOTeam0.039-0.001
IX Biopharma0.043-0.003
KSH Holdings0.250-
Leader Env0.048-0.001
Ley Choon0.042-0.002
Marco Polo Marine0.067-0.001
Mermaid Maritime0.143-0.002
Nordic Group0.315-
Oxley Holdings0.088-0.001
REX International0.143-0.002
Riverstone0.775-0.030
Southern Alliance Mining0.480-0.005
Straco Corp.0.495-
Sunpower Group0.2200.005
The Trendlines0.074-
Totm Technologies0.023-0.001
Uni-Asia Group0.830-
Wilmar Intl3.370-0.120
Yangzijiang Shipbldg1.8100.030
 

We have 1402 guests and no members online

rss_2 NextInsight - Latest News